Back
    Reading
    0%
    Speaking·5 min read·May 15, 2026·Updated June 25, 2026·intermediate
    celpip-speakingtask-7opinionssample-answerstudy-guide

    CELPIP Speaking Task 7: Expressing Opinions in 90 Seconds

    CELPIP Speaking Task 7: Expressing Opinions in 90 Seconds

    CELPIP Speaking Task 7 hands you a yes-or-no question and ninety seconds to defend your answer. Thirty seconds of prep, ninety seconds of speaking, and one big trap: giving one reason three ways instead of three distinct reasons.

    Task 7 is the longest single recording in the Speaking section. Most candidates either freeze at the prep window or pad one idea until the timer runs out.

    What Task 7 Actually Tests

    Thirty seconds of prep. Ninety seconds of speaking. One opinion question on a public-life topic. The rubric rewards a clear stance, three distinct reasons, real examples, and clean transitions between them.

    Ninety seconds is a lot of unsupported space to fill, and the format is built to expose answers that don't have enough material.

    PhaseDetail
    Prep time30 seconds, scratch pad available
    Speaking time90 seconds, one take, no replay
    Question shapeDo you think… ? Take a position and defend it.
    AudienceGeneric. No named friend or colleague.
    Target lengthAbout 160 to 200 words at a natural pace

    The four rubric dimensions are the same as every Speaking task: Content/Coherence, Vocabulary, Listenability, and Task Fulfilment, as set out in the official CELPIP test materials. Task 7 leans heaviest on Content/Coherence. The examiner is counting distinct reasons. One reason rephrased three ways still counts as one.

    Sample Prompt With a CLB 9 Model Answer

    One realistic Task 7 prompt, one model answer scored at CLB 9, with the rubric notes attached.

    The prompt

    Do you think children should be allowed to use smartphones before age 13? Explain your reasons.

    Model answer (about 175 words, CLB 9)

    I don't think children should be allowed to use smartphones before age 13. There are three reasons that matter to me.

    First, brain development. The parts of the brain that handle impulse control aren't fully formed until the late teens. Putting a smartphone in the hands of a ten-year-old is asking them to manage something that grown adults still struggle with.

    Second, the social cost. When my niece got a phone at eleven, she stopped playing outside almost overnight. Her whole friend group moved indoors and onto screens within a couple of months. The convenience didn't feel worth that trade.

    Third, sleep. Canadian paediatric research keeps showing that kids with phones in their bedrooms sleep less and worse. And sleep is the one thing growing kids cannot skimp on.

    So overall, I'd say no, not before 13. Maybe a basic phone for emergencies, but not a smartphone.

    Why this scores CLB 9

    • Three distinct reasons (developmental, social, physical) with specific examples.
    • Precise word choices (impulse control, paediatric, skimp on).
    • Clear discourse markers (First, Second, Third, So overall).
    • Stance stated upfront, defended for 90 seconds, closed with a qualifier.

    Position, Reasons, Close

    Same shape every time. Three moves, ninety seconds. Once it's drilled, the prep window stops being scary.

    Use the 30-second prep to pick your side and jot three single-word reason anchors. Don't try to draft full sentences.

    Move 1. Position (10 to 15 sec)

    State your stance in one sentence. I don't think children should use smartphones before age 13. Add a one-sentence preview if you like. Don't hedge. Don't restate the question.

    Move 2. Reasons (60 to 65 sec)

    Three distinct reasons in roughly equal chunks. Each one: name the reason, give an example, move on. Use plain transitions (First, Second, Third). Pull each reason from a different part of life (developmental, social, physical, financial, educational) so they don't bleed into each other.

    Move 3. Close (10 to 15 sec)

    One-line restatement plus a qualifier. So overall, I'd say no, not before 13. Maybe a basic phone for emergencies, but not a smartphone. Don't open a fourth reason in the last fifteen seconds. You'll run out of time mid-sentence and the rubric punishes incomplete ideas.

    Sitting on the fence kills the score

    Answers that argue both sides equally read as task non-fulfilment and cap at CLB 7. Saying "it depends" or "both have merit" without picking one is the single fastest way to lose marks on this task. Even if it feels 51 / 49, commit and defend the 51.

    Four Pitfalls That Cap Task 7 Scores

    Four patterns turn up in Task 7 answers that cap at CLB 7 even when grammar is clean. Each one is fixable in practice.

    1. One reason rephrased three ways

    It's bad for kids. It hurts development. Their brain growth gets affected. Three sentences, one reason. Build three distinct reasons by pulling from different parts of life. The rubric counts ideas, not sentences.

    2. Reasons without examples

    A reason on its own is half an answer. Smartphones cause health problems needs like the screen-related neck pain Canadian physiotherapists keep seeing behind it. Examples can be personal, statistical, or hypothetical.

    3. Running out of time mid-sentence

    Build the close at the 75-second mark, not the 88-second mark. If time's left over, fill with a brief qualifier rather than half a fourth reason that gets cut off.

    4. Sitting on the fence

    Both sides have a point or it really depends reads as task non-fulfilment. Even if your honest view is 51 / 49, the test wants the 51. Pick a side in the prep window and don't revisit it.

    The official CELPIP LIVE coaching series has a Task 7 session that runs through Expressing Opinions in real time. Useful as a second perspective on what evaluators reward.

    CELPIP LIVE: Speaking Task 7 - Expressing Opinions (Official)

    Verified sources

    Sources & further reading

    Check the official Speaking format and free coaching before you practise opinion answers.

    Independently verifiable · opens on the official site

    CELPIP Speaking Task 7: Common Questions

    Quick answers to what test-takers ask before Task 7.

    Task 7 gives you an opinion question on a public-life topic, usually phrased as <em>Do you think&hellip; ?</em> You take a clear stance and defend it for 90 seconds. Topics range from technology and education to lifestyle and public policy. The audience is generic. There's no named friend or colleague, <a href='/study/speaking/celpip-speaking-task-6' class='text-blue-600 hover:underline'>unlike Task 6</a>.

    30 seconds of prep and 90 seconds of speaking. The 90-second response is the longest single recording in the Speaking section. Use the 30-second prep window to pick your side fast and jot down three single-word reason anchors. Don't try to draft full sentences in your head.

    Pick one side. The CELPIP rubric explicitly rewards a clear stance. Answers that argue both sides equally are scored as task non-fulfilment and cap around CLB 7. You can acknowledge the other side in your close (<em>maybe a basic phone for emergencies</em>) but the main 90 seconds has to defend one position.

    Task 6 is a conversation with a specific named person about a specific decision. Task 7 is an opinion answer on a broad question with a generic audience. Task 6 rewards empathy, address, and an alternative. Task 7 rewards a clear yes/no stance, three distinct reasons, and supporting examples. Different shapes, different rubrics, different prep moves.

    Thirty seconds to pick a side, ninety to defend it. Three distinct reasons, three examples, one tidy close. Task 7 stops being the freeze-prone task the moment you trust the framework.